Page 2 of 2
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:03 pm
by mumbles
So is Emma Webster ,Naomi on 1861 Census ?
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:57 pm
by Northern Lass
mumbles wrote:So is Emma Webster ,Naomi on 1861 Census ?
Could well be area is good isnt it
where are the family on 1871?
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:11 pm
by grangers14
1871. Ross, Rowley Regis
John Webster, head, 47, Rivet Maker, Halesowen
Ann, wife, 42, Market Bosworth
John, son, 16,
Noah, son, 13,
Anne, daur, 11,
Uri, son, 9,
Mirah, daur, 4,
David, son, 1
All others born Rowley Regis
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:24 pm
by rockyfowler
Name: ARMSTRONG, Humphrey
Registration district: Madeley
County: Shropshire
Year of registration: 1841
Quarter of registration: Oct-Nov-Dec
Volume no: 18
Page no: 129
PHILIPS, Tabitha
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:56 pm
by Northern Lass
thanks so not with family in 1871
odd isnt it

Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:57 pm
by grangers14
I think that Naomi on 1861 is Noah on 1871. I cant see a birth that fits for Naomi and theres a birth for Noah.
Jo

Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:34 am
by Northern Lass
mumbles wrote:So is Emma Webster ,Naomi on 1861 Census ?
I think you can only add in notes for emma as a possible mumbles
something aint rite.......
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:18 am
by mumbles
Have added all I can with notes
Re: Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:29 pm
by Northern Lass
Thanks Mumbles
Flagging to archive if all done

Re: ARC TBC...................Thomas Baker born 1877/1878
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 8:52 am
by mumbles
Archive NL