Page 2 of 2
Re: Oscars Coleys do they link to Richard Coley Smith b 1838
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 12:53 pm
by Northern Lass
flagging to archive if all done on this thread
Re: ARC tbc...Oscars Coleys / link to Richard Coley Smith b
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:39 pm
by oscar
Thats correct Jan thanks will keep lookin for bap
Re: ARC tbc...Oscars Coleys / link to Richard Coley Smith b
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:15 pm
by oscar
parents:
Samuel Coley,"‹ Hannah
name:
James Coley
gender:
Male
baptism/christening date:
19 Feb 1775
baptism/christening place:
HALESOWEN,WORCESTER,ENGLAND
father's name:
Samuel Coley
mother's name:
Hannah
indexing project (batch) number:
C01376-2
system origin:England-ODM
source film number886632, 886633, 886634
Re: Oscars Coleys do they link to Richard Coley Smith b 1838
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:25 pm
by Northern Lass
oscar wrote:James coley born 1775 -1844 Halesowen married Lydia Wood
children are
William Wood Coley1796 "“
Joseph Coley1798 "“
Lydia Coley1799 "“
Sarah Coley1801 "“
Mary Coley1804 "“
James Coley1806 "“
Ann Coley1810 "“
Betty Coley1811
John Coley1813 "“ 1887
Susanna Coley1888
Sarah being my 4xgrandmother
Samuel Coley Birth1735 in Halesowen, Worcestershire, England Death1829 in Halesowen, Worcestershire, England
most of this is a work in progress and started mainly from FS just now putting it thro ancestry
samuels marriage poss1760 halesowen james poss1796 but still tracking these down
Ok Oscar added here
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =417220258are Samuel and Hannah 5 x gt
then James and Lydia 4 x gt
then is Sarah b 1888 your line 3xgt?
if so I can add that in notes
how do you know Lydia is a Lydia wood?
Re: ARC tbc...Oscars Coleys / link to Richard Coley Smith b
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:30 pm
by oscar
My Sarah was born 1801 not 1888

rest is correct ,the wood as i recall came from family search but will recheck
Re: ARC tbc...Oscars Coleys / link to Richard Coley Smith b
Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:31 pm
by Northern Lass
oscar wrote:My Sarah was born 1801 not 1888

rest is correct ,the wood as i recall came from family search but will recheck
Sorry meant 1801
ok will add to notes check what I add will you
