Page 2 of 2

Re: Mark Priest b ?

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:15 pm
by Jimmy
You could be right there, this looks like is reg.

Births Sep 1840.
Priest John. Dudley. 18. 275.

Re: Mark Priest b ?

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:31 pm
by peterd
poss true marriage needs checking

TRUE PRIEST
ELIJAH RAYBOLD
Marriage: 24 JUN 1833 Halesowen, Worcester,


http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =126220689

Re: Mark Priest b ?

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:22 pm
by linell
This may be of some help. Elijah Raybould bach otp signed, True Priest sp otp X. Witnesses Henry Raybould and Mary ?

Re: Mark Priest b ?

Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:15 am
by dianel
Ooh, you're a suspicious fellow, Pete! But, yes, I agree, that looks very likely. John seems to have been born before their marriage with next son shortly after the marriage.

Re: Mark Priest b ?

Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:22 pm
by Northern Lass
This I think is all on Connections now here.....nice one Pete! :wink:

http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... onnections

So unless otherwise advised this topic will be moved to archived section within 24 hrs.

:wink: