Genealogy Forum UK

gardener wrote:Could you have focussed that any worse?

Thats what I said!
'Tis the sons fault ...
Jo

I'm sure my daughter has one like that - left by my mother in law - I'll ask her for a couple of items. This one dates back to about 1900 I think

gardener wrote:Could you have focussed that any worse?

I can't find it but this cup has some similarities - I'm not convinced that the saucer and plate match though.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Pretty-Vintag ... 7256427242

I will try and get a better photo done

that one on ebay looks more modern
mine is similar but not same mine looks older I think

Why don't you e mail a photo of it to that orange man who does the antique programmes on the tele ?

Antie Em wrote:Why don't you e mail a photo of it to that orange man who does the antique programmes on the tele ?

Orange man?

Here he is : http://www.david-dickinson.net/about-da ... -biog1.htm

Only when he's on the tele he looks like he's spent too much time on the sun bed.

Antie Em wrote:Why don't you e mail a photo of it to that orange man who does the antique programmes on the tele ?

I thought you meant the one from Del monte

http://www.thepotteries.org/allpotters/230.htm

The site above has slightly confusing information... but it says that LTD was added to Cartwright and Edwards after about 1926 so if this doesn't have LTD then it would be earlier. And Victoria was a trademark after about 1912. So that would make yours 1912-1926. Only then they show a stamp which is later but doesn't have the LTD on either

Antie Em wrote:Here he is : http://www.david-dickinson.net/about-da ... -biog1.htm

Only when he's on the tele he looks like he's spent too much time on the sun bed.

I get it