BEASLEY John HACKETT Mary 1919 Halesowen, St John the Baptist Dudley Register Office 014/010/77
BEASLEY John POWELL Louie 1928 Halesowen, St John the Baptist Dudley Register Office 014/011/221
Marriages 1919 & 1928 St. John Halesowen for Mumbles
Moderators: admin, Northern Lass
-
rockyfowler
- Posts: 6539
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:35 pm
- Primary Surname Interests: Hill James Street
- Primary Geographical Research Areas: Rowley Regis Quarry Bank Birmingham
Re: Marriages 1919 & 1928 St. John Halesowen for Mumbles
1919
77 12 Oct John BEASLEY 29 B Carpenter 21 Hall Street Netherton Father John Beasley (Dec) Labourer Mary HACKETT 32 S Button Sorter 8 Love Lane Halesowen Father Edwin Hackett (Dec) Nail Maker After Banns Both Signed Wit; __? Hackett / Elizabeth Beasley
1928
John BEASLEY 38 W Carpenter 356 Halesowen Rd Netherton Father Jonathan Beasley (Dec) (Blank) Louie POWELL 38 S 35 Church View Halesowen Father Samuel Powell (Dec) (Blank) After Banns Wit; Tom Powell / Elizabeth Groundsell
77 12 Oct John BEASLEY 29 B Carpenter 21 Hall Street Netherton Father John Beasley (Dec) Labourer Mary HACKETT 32 S Button Sorter 8 Love Lane Halesowen Father Edwin Hackett (Dec) Nail Maker After Banns Both Signed Wit; __? Hackett / Elizabeth Beasley
1928
John BEASLEY 38 W Carpenter 356 Halesowen Rd Netherton Father Jonathan Beasley (Dec) (Blank) Louie POWELL 38 S 35 Church View Halesowen Father Samuel Powell (Dec) (Blank) After Banns Wit; Tom Powell / Elizabeth Groundsell
“As I learned from growing up, you don’t mess with your grandmother.” — Prince William
Re: Marriages 1919 & 1928 St. John Halesowen for Mumbles
Thanks RF ,
So they do not appear to be same John Beasley as fathers different
So they do not appear to be same John Beasley as fathers different
Re: Marriages 1919 & 1928 St. John Halesowen for Mumbles
Had another look at 1928 marriage ( no date) and it shows John Beasley as Widow so could be right one and Jonathan as father is an error