ARCHIVE TBC. Frederick Arthur Floyd

Completed discussions and topics. All topics are locked on archive. Please contact a forum moderator if you'd like a thread reactivated.

Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass

User avatar
Jimmy
Posts: 22696
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
Location: Kidderminster.

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Jimmy »

So this looks like Fredericks parents,

Marriages Sep 1866.
BLUNDELL Jane. Preston 8e. 722.
BRADSHAW George. Preston 8e. 722.
CHARNLEY Elizabeth A J. Preston. 8e. 722.
Woods Thomas. Preston 8e. 722.

Thomas Woods.
Bride's Name: Elizabeth Anne Jane Thurnley.
Marriage Date: 17 Sep 1866.
Marriage Place: St. John'S, Preston, Lancashire.
Groom's Father's Name: William Woods.
Bride's Father's Name: Blank.
Indexing Project (Batch) Number: M00931-8.
System Origin: England-EASy.
Source Film Number: 1278760.
Reference Number: it8p36

Or the same one, without parents on.
Thomas Woods.
Bride's Name: Elizabeth Anne Jane Charnley.
Marriage Date: 17 Sep 1866.
Marriage Place: Saint John,Preston,Lancashire.
Indexing Project (Batch) Number: M00713-3.
System Origin: England-ODM.
Source Film Number: 94000.
yerffej
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:47 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Heighway
Primary Geographical Research Areas: liverpool

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by yerffej »

So in the 1881 census it looks like she wasn't with James Charnley after all so that rules him out as the father. The Woods children must all be related to her, not him. James was possibly her brother? Not old enough to be her father.
Thomas must have died and she then married John. I still can't understand why he is Floyd on the marriage certificate and John is down as his father though
User avatar
Jimmy
Posts: 22696
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
Location: Kidderminster.

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Jimmy »

Jimmy wrote:1881.
James CHARNLEY Head U Male 43 Preston, Lancashire, England Cord Grinder Unemployed
Elizabeth A.J. WOODS Lodger W Female 33 Preston, Lancashire, England Dressmaker
William A. WOODS Son Male 13 Preston, Lancashire, England Stonemasons Labourer
John J. WOODS Son Male 12 Preston, Lancashire, England Scholar
Frances L. WOODS Daur Female 10 Preston, Lancashire, England Scholar
Frederick A. WOODS Son Male 9 Preston, Lancashire, England Scholar
Edith A. WOODS Daur Female 7 Preston, Lancashire, England Scholar
Ernest R. WOODS Son Male 2 Preston, Lancashire, England
John William FLOYD Lodger M Male 39 Uphampton, Worcester, England Carpenter & House Joiner

54 Victoria St.
Preston, Lancashire.


This James CHARNLEY could be a brother to her or related.
yerffej
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:47 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Heighway
Primary Geographical Research Areas: liverpool

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by yerffej »

yerffej wrote:So in the 1881 census it looks like she wasn't with James Charnley after all so that rules him out as the father. The Woods children must all be related to her, not him. James was possibly her brother? Not old enough to be her father.
Thomas must have died and she then married John. I still can't understand why he is Floyd on the marriage certificate and John is down as his father though


Could they just write anything they liked on the certificates? Surely they are legal documents??
yerffej
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:47 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Heighway
Primary Geographical Research Areas: liverpool

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by yerffej »

Just noticed John is listed as married in 1881 census?? This is getting more complicated by the minute!! :?:
Stonewaller
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:01 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Dickinson Winter Carter Lewis Tunley Northgraves Hopcott
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Gloucestershire Buckinghamshire Berkshire Hertfordshire

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Stonewaller »

I tend to agree with you about Frederick's parenthood. I suspect that under "relationship to head" there is a mistake and that it is meant that he (and his siblings) are sons/daughters of Elizabeth WOODS. As for the marriage certificate: I think we can only speculate.

(apologies: in my earlier post I should have put Frances' age as 1 (one))
User avatar
Jimmy
Posts: 22696
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
Location: Kidderminster.

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Jimmy »

yerffej wrote:Just noticed John is listed as married in 1881 census?? This is getting more complicated by the minute!! :?:


Possible for John,

1871. Bowdon, Cheshire.
John Floyd 30. House Joiner. Ombersley, Worcestershire.
Eliza Floyd 32. Riddich, Worcestershire.
Lydia Floyd 6. Riddich, Worcestershire.
Sarah Floyd 4. Manchester, Lancashire.
Frances H Floyd 2. Bowdon, Cheshire.
Alfred Fullalove 25. Lodger. Manchester, Lancashire,
Last edited by Jimmy on Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jimmy
Posts: 22696
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 9:40 am
Primary Surname Interests: Ancestry
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Worcestershire, Staffordshire.
Location: Kidderminster.

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Jimmy »

I can't see a marriage for John Floyd and Elizabeth A.J Woods.
yerffej
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:47 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Heighway
Primary Geographical Research Areas: liverpool

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by yerffej »

Could anyone find me the 1871 census for Elizabeth and Thomas Woods please. As Frederick Arthur was born that year I was wondering if Elizabeth and John were any where near each other at the time. I'm trying to find out if there is any chance that John was the father. Thank you.
User avatar
Antie Em
Posts: 4309
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:17 am
Primary Surname Interests: Salt, Jones, Humphries, Riley, Barklam/Bartlam, Shilvock, Guest
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Halesowen, Dudley, Clent, Tipton, Rowley Regis, Kingswinford, Wall Heath
Contact:

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Antie Em »

Is this them - earlier in this thread - by Stonewaller

I have also found what Jimmy found on the 1881 census.

In 1871, at 1 Sidney Place, Preston:
Thomas WOODS Head Mar Male 31 Preston, Lancashire, Cotton Weaver
Eliz. WOODS Wife Mar Female 25 Preston, Lancashire
William A. WOODS Son Male 3 Preston, Lancashire, Scholar
John J. WOODS Son Male 2 Preston, Lancashire
Frances WOODS Daur Female 10 Preston, Lancashire

Hope this helps.
There's no place like home ......
yerffej
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:47 pm
Primary Surname Interests: Heighway
Primary Geographical Research Areas: liverpool

Re: Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by yerffej »

Thank you That's a great help as I now know they were in separate counties the year Frederick was born. I am going to continue searching both Floyd and Woods for a little while just to see what happens. I will start a new thread for Thomas Woods.
On Frederick's marriage to Mary Bessie Higgins he lists his father as John William Floyd (deceased) in 1904 He was an architect The marriage was at The Parish Church of South Shore, County of Lancaster They were living at 33 Bagot Street. Could we possibly find out anything about John William Floyd please. Thanks again for your help on this :)
User avatar
Northern Lass
Posts: 46029
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:12 am
Primary Surname Interests: Hinett, Rose, Round, Shakespear, Wilkins,
Primary Geographical Research Areas: Black Country, Wiltshire, Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: ARCHIVE TBC. Frederick Arthur Floyd

Post by Northern Lass »

As this is an old post flagging now to see if all finished with.
Unless otherwise advised will move to archived in 24 hours.
Locked

Return to “Archived General Discussion”