I am back on the trail of researching my family history again, and this time I am looking to write chapter and verse on all that I find. I'm starting from the earliest member of my tree and gathering as much details as I possibly can. As this is the 1st William in my tree, I am referring to him as William 1st.

Ok, what I am stuck on is his actual death record. Now I have researched through ancestry, and this is what I know:
Death before 1871
William 1st doesn't appear on the 1871 census with Sarah Toy, she is living alone, and her condition of marriage is Widow.
Possible Death record:
William Toy
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1788
Date of reg: Jan-Feb-Mar 1871
Age at death: 83
Registration district: Stourbridge
Inferred county: Worcestershire
There is clearly a discrepency in the age here, as William was 68 according to the 1871 census, and thus would have been 78 in 1871. This opposes the evidence.
The census was taken on 2nd April 1871, so if this is William 1st, then he would have been dead before the census took place, this supports the evidence.
There doesn't seem to be anymore William Toy's born in Worcestershire around 1788 (+/- 5 years).
According to the census records William 1st age could be:
1841 - 45
age could have been 45 - 49 as ages were rounded down so his DOB could have been between 1792 - 1796. This is still 4 years out from his Estimated Birth year of 1788 on the death record.
1851 - 60 (5 years older then expected)
1861 - 68 (2 years younger than expected)
I'm leaning towards accepting that this is in fact the actual death record of William 1st.
Does anyone believe that I may be wrong in assuming that this is the actual death record of my William 1st? Even though the estimated age at death is not accurate.