ARC TBC - Keefes of Oldbury

Completed discussions and topics. All topics are locked on archive. Please contact a forum moderator if you'd like a thread reactivated.

Moderators: grangers14, admin, BC Wench

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby grangers14 » Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:20 pm

grangers14 wrote:?? Looking for the family earlier census?

1851. Stone Street, West Bromwich
Thomas Keef, head, 32, Labourer,
Mary, wife, 34,
Margaret, daur, 11, West Bromwich
Ann, daur, 7, Dudley
Thomas, son, 3, Dudley
John, son, 1, Dudley
Mark Couly, lodger, 28, Labourer,
Mary, lodger, 23,
John, lodger, 8 months,
Jane Ward, lodger, 23, Brickmaker
Margaret Burke, lodger, 22, Brickmaker
All others born Ireland


Could this be the family in 1851?

I think it would help if we have the census and children added to BCC just make it clear whats what :?

I will try over the weekend to add but if you can say if that family looks right in 1851
Jo :)
User avatar
grangers14
 
Posts: 15180
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Location: North East

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby Dennis » Sat Dec 18, 2010 8:49 pm

Very many thanks, cloudyskies. I agree that we seem to have clashing information which could suggest two separate families. But I've been in touch with Keefe family members over the years who were convinced thet we had the same family and who had photos, documents etc. and information about Thomas the sprinter, the Keefe who died in the pit accident in Co Durham, the one who fell down the blowhole at the glass works etc., they were part of family lore handed down. So it's all becoming a bit of a mystery! Irish immigrants sometimes sought "protective coloration", as it were, by claiming in the censuses to have been born locally in England, I've come across this several times with other Irish Catholic families. There was sometimes a degree of prejudice against them, of course, so it's understandable. If we do have two different Keefe families, I wonder at which point they diverge. Could anybody out there advise?
Dennis
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:26 am

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby grangers14 » Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:43 pm

I think it would be good to add to BCC and then we can see from there.

I have strated to add, not completed because Ive been tied up with Powells! :lol:

I think its worth if you have the marriage or ask for a look up of Thomas and Mary that looks very likely that Peter found
KEEFE Thomas DALY Mary 1841 West Bromwich Register Office West Midlands Sandwell Register Office WBRO/1/52

If either you have certificates it would be useful to have that info too.

Do either you have them or do they need looking up?

Jo :)
User avatar
grangers14
 
Posts: 15180
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Location: North East

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby Dennis » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:51 pm

Yes, by all means add, please, grangers14, while we investigate. I haven't got the certificates, I'm afraid.
Dennis
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:26 am

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby grangers14 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 12:11 am

I will start adding other bits and we need look ups to confirm then.
It will make things more clear. :grin:
Jo :)
User avatar
grangers14
 
Posts: 15180
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Location: North East

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby cloudyskies » Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:15 pm

If the KEEFE family came over from Cork, it would have been when Thomas (b. 1870) was a teenager (hinted at by Martin in his memoirs). Therefore the family may not have been in England for the 1881 census (although John and Phoebe KEEFE whom I thought were Thomas' (b. 1870) parents are on both the 1871 and 1881 censuses for Park Street, Oldbury) and Thomas would have been in America for the 1891 census. I am sure that I have the correct census returns for Thomas (b. 1870) for 1901 and 1911- both of which stated that he was born in Oldbury. This must be due to the reasons stated by Dennis. I cannot find any record for Thomas (b. 1870) being born in Oldbury, but there are possible matches for his siblings.

So, I guess we need to prove that John KEEFE and Phoebe MATTHEWS are not the parents of Thomas (b. 1870). There are records of KEEFEs being born in Oldbury since 1841, so they could be another family?
cloudyskies
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby Dennis » Sun Dec 19, 2010 2:11 pm

Many thanks, cloudyskies, that seems to be where the split would come. I haven't a certificate for Thomas b. 1870, his parents on that would be the clincher.
Dennis
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:26 am

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby Northern Lass » Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:34 am

I am moving it to Brickwalls just read some of it
that way you can all pick away at it :wink:
User avatar
Northern Lass
 
Posts: 45863
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:12 am

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby grangers14 » Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:07 pm

I have been adding children and census

This looks like its Thomas birth
West Midlands Birth indexes for the years: 1870
KEEF Thomas Oldbury Sandwell Register Office OLD/44/6

If you get that then you will be able to prove parents.

Jo :)
User avatar
grangers14
 
Posts: 15180
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Location: North East

Re: Keefes of Oldbury

Postby BC Wench » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:55 pm

Is this still a Brickwall, or have you solved it?

Unless otherwise advised this will be moved to the Brickwalls Archived section
within 24 hours
Researching: PARGETER, BELCHER, BRADLEY, DANDO, ROWLEY, ROWSELL
User avatar
BC Wench
 
Posts: 3218
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:59 pm

Previous

Return to Archived Brick Wall Posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest