Completed discussions and lookup requests. All topics are locked on archive. Please contact a forum moderator if you'd like a thread re-activated.
Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass, peterd
by gardener » Mon Dec 29, 2008 9:58 pm
Hi
I had a bit of a reshuffle with the Woodhouses (not quite finished yet).
I detached one branch...this one:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =357896588Di, I think that the Thomas baptised at Rowley Regis in 1795 is this one:
http://bcconnections.tribalpages.com/tr ... =687663090so I left the Stonall one unattached. Do you have anything to suggest that he came from Rowley Regis? As you show his birthplace is given in 1851 as Ogley Hay. Would you like to think about the Francis/Hannah option for his parents? And is his wife actually Elizabeth Woodhouse or is she Elizabeth unknown?
Last edited by
gardener on Fri Jan 02, 2009 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The present is the key to the past" - Charles Lyell
-
gardener
-
- Posts: 3226
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 5:49 pm
- Location: Iceland
-
by dianel » Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:07 am
I agree, Kate, the Thomas 1795 that you have found seems much more likely to have been the son of William & Ann. The wife of Thomas from Shenstone, I have down as Elizabeth "Woodhouse?" in my records. Dunno why I thought so now.
Some mistakes are too much fun
to only make once.
-
dianel
-
- Posts: 3132
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:51 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Return to Black Country: Archived Topics
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests