Help needed reading census

Completed discussions and topics. All topics are locked on archive. Please contact a forum moderator if you'd like a thread reactivated.

Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass

Help needed reading census

Postby MattFletcher » Mon Jan 11, 2016 10:24 pm

Can anyone decipher the added text on this 1851 census entry?
ed51.JPG
ed51.JPG (36.76 KiB) Viewed 1379 times


It reads: Edmund Williams, Bastard Boy (crossed out with some text above it), 7, a base child

I am trying to read the text above Bastard Boy as it may give some clue as how Edmund ended up in this household.

The record can be seen here https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QKV6-GFVJ and if you have access to findmypast you can click through to see the original image.

Matt
MattFletcher
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:59 am

Re: Help needed reading census

Postby rockyfowler » Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:17 am

Being Moved ?
“You know you’re getting old when you stoop to tie your shoelaces and wonder what else you could do while you’re down there.” ― George Burns
rockyfowler
 
Posts: 6389
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 3:35 pm

Re: Help needed reading census

Postby SRD » Tue Jan 12, 2016 8:20 am

Being married?

There's no proof obviously but if his father Thomas was of the opinion that the child wasn't his he might have used the original form to voice his suspicions. The Registrar dutifully filled in the main register from the form but the Superintendent Registrar may then have struck through the entry and added his own comment after reviewing it.

Well, it's a nice story :lol:
Currently investigating the Hillmans of Sussex.
User avatar
SRD
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:34 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Help needed reading census

Postby MattFletcher » Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:28 am

rockyfowler wrote:Being Moved ?


Good suggestion ... Being definitely looks correct ... Moved does too except that "Being Moved" doesn't make much sense in context :cry:
MattFletcher
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:59 am

Re: Help needed reading census

Postby MattFletcher » Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:32 am

SRD wrote:Being married?

There's no proof obviously but if his father Thomas was of the opinion that the child wasn't his he might have used the original form to voice his suspicions. The Registrar dutifully filled in the main register from the form but the Superintendent Registrar may then have struck through the entry and added his own comment after reviewing it.


You could definitely be on the right lines here. The full record shows that Edmund was born with a different surname (his mother's presumably) and location to the rest of the household. It's unclear to me whether the head, the unimaginatively named Thomas Thomas is indicated as his father. The text probably clarifies or corrects the "Bastard Boy" description in some way.
MattFletcher
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:59 am


Return to Archived General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests