Completed discussions and topics. All topics are locked on archive. Please contact a forum moderator if you'd like a thread reactivated.
Moderators: grangers14, admin, Northern Lass
by MarkCDodd » Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:56 pm
The second certificate, which has no backward reference to the first on certificate or index, has her correct date of birth but a later date of registration.
The original certificate is not changed.
They never correct original certificates. If an error is found or changes made they reissue another.
So I have plenty who have two marriage cert for instance as incorrect spelling is reported.
In Australia they have the same registration number but an R placed before or after the number (depending on which state).
Black Holes happen when God divides by zero.
-
MarkCDodd
-
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:55 am
by mickwood » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:08 pm
MarkCDodd wrote:A law was brought in in 1928 that allowed you to have a new certificate issued without any need for adoption.
Hmmmm.....that leads me to assume that as an adoption had taken place, rather than a new certificate being issued, the adoptive father is not the biological father? The assumption is based on the fact that it's easier to get a new certificate rather than going through a formal adoption, so to go through the adoption process must have been for a specific reason - eg. the father is not the biological father.
Researching: DWYER, WOOD, ORGAN and WYLDBORE-SMITH
-
mickwood
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:30 pm
Return to Archived General Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests