Yes, this subject is now completed.
Thanks
Ken
Search found 9 matches
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:31 pm
- Forum: The Archive
- Topic: Missing in the 1881 British Census
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1379
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:24 am
- Forum: The Archive
- Topic: Missing in the 1881 British Census
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1379
Re: Missing in the 1881 British Census
Hi Rocky,
Absolutely brilliant- don't know how you did it but you did. Another "brick wall " demolished!!!
Thanks very much.
Regards
Ken
Absolutely brilliant- don't know how you did it but you did. Another "brick wall " demolished!!!
Thanks very much.
Regards
Ken
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 7:47 am
- Forum: The Archive
- Topic: Missing in the 1881 British Census
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1379
Re: Missing in the 1881 British Census
Thanks Rocky but it's the 1881 that's the brickwall - I've got the 1891 census already.
Thanks for responding
Ken
Thanks for responding
Ken
- Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:29 am
- Forum: The Archive
- Topic: Missing in the 1881 British Census
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1379
Missing in the 1881 British Census
Hi, After searching all the available online data bases I'm still unable to trace my grandmother, her parents and siblings in the 1881 census. I suspect the surname may have been mistranscribed but all the similar names I've come up with don't get a match. They were:- John Frederick GOULTY b Lambeth...
- Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:35 pm
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Surname Interests
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1991
Surname Interests
Hi All, I'm researching the following ancestors: Mary CHIPPERFIELD b.btw 16 Dec 1796 and 16 Dec 1797, Epping, Essex. d. 16 Dec 1854 Leonard Charles CURTIS b. 1 Jun 1899 Brixton, London - last heard of in 1928 in Melbourne, Australia Phillip(e) NOVRA b. 1808 (app) Lislo, Prussia. d. Q3 1891m. Sarah A...
- Sat Apr 10, 2010 6:43 am
- Forum: Archived General Discussion
- Topic: Missing in the 1891 Census
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1366
Re: Missing in the 1891 Census
Hi Maths girl, I've been to my local library where they have Ancestry online and I found the image of the 1891census that you found for me. Thanks, you were correct - I believe it's the right one. Very hard to read the writing but given that the family were involved with the East India company and t...
- Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:28 pm
- Forum: Archived General Discussion
- Topic: Missing in the 1891 Census
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1366
Re: Missing in the 1891 Census
Hi again,
Yes, the 1871 and 1891 are correct. I don't think the 1891 is correct unless they mistranscribed his age and surname.
Regards,
Ken
Yes, the 1871 and 1891 are correct. I don't think the 1891 is correct unless they mistranscribed his age and surname.
Regards,
Ken
- Thu Apr 08, 2010 10:09 am
- Forum: Archived General Discussion
- Topic: Missing in the 1891 Census
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1366
Missing in the 1891 Census
Hi, I've just about given up on finding some ancestors in the 1891 census and I've tried Ancestry and Findmypast but with no luck. I'm wondering if there is a section of that census that's missing. Here are the people I'm trying to trace and most of them I've found in both the 1881 and 1901 censuses...
- Thu Apr 08, 2010 9:58 am
- Forum: The Archive
- Topic: Hi all
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1011
Hi all
I've been building my family trees for a few years now and I'm starting to come against those pesky brick walls. My interests are as follows: MASONs in London and Essex - HALKETs and WEBBs in Wiltshire and Australia - NOVRA in London - ALLANs in Canada BC and NS - HARRISs in Shanghai and Canada and ...