by AndrewA » Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:45 pm
OK here are a few more details and it is rather confusing.
The date of Birth, 17 March 1862 was obtained from his certificate of service.
1881 census - HMS Northampton
His service certificate shows that he was on HMS Northampton for the 1881 Census. The census records have only one David Henry on the aforementioned ship, where his age upon previous birthday is listed as 20, this would indeed give his birth as 1861.
Other Census entries.
Subsequent census entries give his age as, 29,39,49 etc, which would tie in with the March 62 birth.
Marriage certificate.
I have his original marriage certificate as well, which lists his marriage as 27th Nov 1888, with his age as being 27, which places him his birth well and truely in 1861.
His father is listed as deceased and occupation a confectioner.
The Entry for 14 Jun 1861
After re-evaluating this information I tracked down the entry on Scotland's People and paid 5 credits to view it. this is the only entry for a david henry born in Aberdeenshire with father David, for 1861 and 1862.
David HENRY, Born 14 June 1861, 7.15am, 103 Skene Street Aberdeen.
Parents Details
David Henry Confectioner Journeyman
Jane Henry formerly Smith
M S Anderson
married 1856 May 2nd Aberdeen.
Conclusion:
HELP! I have a headache, but this appeals to my logical thinking.
Obviously we can say 100% for certain that the Certificate of Service is for David Henry, this is the original document handed down through the family, along with other documents.
A serious issue we now have is the date of birth on this document, 17th Mar 1862. A huge question mark hangs over this, surely his service document carried through his life would not have such an error in date of birth? surely it would have been corrected at some point?
This now conflicts with the census entry for HMS Northampton in 1881 along with strong evidence in form of the marriage certificate, stating that Henry was 27 in November 1888. Further the entry on the marriage certificate along with the entry for the David HENRY 1861 record, both show father as confectioner, is this too much to be a co-incidence?
Subsequent census entries lists him as 29,39 etc. If he was born in March 1862, these ages would be correct, however they are also correct if he was born in June 1861.... not much help there.
Nothing is simple.. however this is another example I have that I can use to show people that family research is not as simple as the adverts make out.
Hit a Brickwall? Have you lost all trace of someone? Do not despair, simply make a note they were abducted by aliens! Don't believe in aliens? No problem, just write them off as having disapeared in a time portal